Tang Center for Early China

唐氏早期中國研究中心
(中文網頁)  (日本語ページ)
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • People
      • Administration
      • Executive Committee
      • Visiting Scholars
      • Postdoctoral Fellows
    • Founding of the Center
    • Newsletter
      • Spring 2019
      • Fall 2018
      • Spring 2018
      • Fall 2017
      • Spring 2017
      • Fall 2016
    • Links
      • Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures
      • P.Y. and Kinmay W. Tang Center for East Asian Art
      • P.Y. and Kinmay W. Tang Center for Silk Road Studies
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Media Library
  • Programs
    • The Early China Seminar Series
    • The Tang Special Annual Lecture in Archaeology
    • The Tang Post-Doctoral Research Award in Early China Studies
    • The Tang Visiting Scholar’s Fellowship
    • Workshop and Conference Grants
    • Past Recipients and Fellows
    • The Tang Pre-Doctoral Research Grant in Early China Studies – for Columbia applicants
    • The Tang Special Prize Fellowship – for Columbia applicants
  • Early China Seminar
  • Tang Lectures
  • Workshops & Conferences
  • Publications
    • Tang Center Series in Early China
    • Co-sponsored Publications

March 02, 2018

Early China Seminar Lecture Series

Title: “Notes on the Note (ji 記) in Early Chinese Manuscripts: Between Administration and Affect”
Speaker: Luke Habberstad, University of Oregon
Time: March 02, 2018 (4:30-6:30 PM)
Location: 1754 Board Room, Faculty House

Students of early Chinese manuscript culture continue to debate various typologies of the ever-growing corpus of excavated evidence. Many, however, at least implicitly agree on a distinction between “administrative” documents on the one hand and “literary” or “philosophical” manuscripts on the other, and correspondingly focus on the different conventions that characterized both categories. The distinction is by no means unhelpful or wholly inaccurate, but it nonetheless raises the question: Are all “administrative” documents bereft of “literary” affectations?

The paper explores this and related questions through an analysis of excavated and received examples, primarily from the Qin and Western Han, of the “note” (ji 記), a murky category that encompassed everything from formal government orders and reports to messages and letters exchanged between people. At the same time, our sources do allow us to trace a transformation in the ji from pre-imperial to early imperial periods: initially referring to annalistic records maintained in state archives, or supposedly ancient texts containing authoritative knowledge, by the Han period the dominant meaning of the ji was “note” or “letter.” Even if the emergence of commentarial practices had a role in this transformation, this essay argues that the expansion and solidification of different types of administrative texts, including “notes” that allowed for more casual orders, efficient communication, and affective exchanges, also played a role. Without calling for the abandonment of the “administrative” vs. “literary” rubric, the paper nonetheless encourages an examination of convention and rhetorical affect in texts central to quotidian government operations in order to better understand key changes in the early Chinese literature.

Filed Under: events-past, events_2017_2018, hmpg-events-left, seminar-series-program-archive, seminar_spa_2017_2018

Announcement

April 11, 2025 – Online
Early China Seminar – Noa Hegesh
New Publication – Tang Center Series in Early China
Remembrance in Clay and Stone – Hajni Elias

Contact:

Tang Center for Early China – Columbia University
606 Uris Hall, MC 5984
3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027

Mailing address:
509 Kent Hall, MC 3907
1140 Amsterdam Ave,
Tel: 212.854.5546  Fax: 212.851.2510
E-mail: [email protected]

  • MEMBERSHIP
  • FEEDBACK
  • GIVE

Follow us on:

Copyright © 2025 · Tang Center for Early China